World

U.S. Congress ends mass phone-record surveillance by NSA

President Barack Obama has signed into law a bill that approves sweeping changes to surveillance laws enacted after the Sept. 11 attacks.

President Barack Obama signs bill into law

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, right, suffered a major embarassment on Tuesday when his requested amendments to the USA Freedom Act were rejected. (Andrew Harnik/Associated Press)

President Barack Obama has signed into law a bill that approves sweeping changes to surveillance laws enacted after the Sept. 11 attacks.

The president signed the bill late Tuesday evening, hours after the Senate gave its final approval in a 67-32 vote.

In a statement, Obama said he's gratified Congress finally approved the bill, adding his administration will move quickly to restore the lapsed surveillance tools.

The law eliminates the National Security Agency's bulk phone-records collection program and replaces it with a more restrictive measure that will keep the records in the hands of phone companies.

The new law revives most of the programs the Senate had allowed to lapse in a dizzying collision of presidential politics and national security policy. But the authorization will undergo major changes, the legacy of agency contractor Edward Snowden's explosive revelations two years ago about domestic spying by the government.

Shifting alliances

In an unusual shifting of alliances, the legislation passed with the support of Obama and Republican House Speaker John Boehner, but over the strong opposition of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

McConnell failed to persuade the Senate to extend the current law unchanged, and came up short in a last-ditch effort Tuesday to amend the House version, as nearly a dozen of his own Republicans abandoned him in a series of votes.

"This is a step in the wrong direction," a frustrated McConnell said on the Senate floor ahead of the Senate's final vote to approve the House version, dubbed the USA Freedom Act. He said the legislation "does not enhance the privacy protections of American citizens. And it surely undermines American security by taking one more tool from our warfighters at exactly the wrong time."

The legislation remakes the most controversial aspect of the USA Patriot Act — the once-secret bulk collection program that allows the National Security Agency to sweep up Americans' phone records and comb through them for ties to international terrorists. Over six months the NSA would lose the power to collect and store those records, but the government still could gain court orders to obtain data connected to specific numbers from the phone companies, which typically store them for 18 months.

Dramatic events

It would also continue other post-9/11 surveillance provisions that lapsed Sunday night, and which are considered more effective than the phone-data collection program. These include the FBI's authority to gather business records in terrorism and espionage investigations, and to more easily eavesdrop on suspects who are discarding cellphones to avoid surveillance.

The outcome capped a dramatic series of events on Capitol Hill that saw a Republican presidential candidate, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, defy fellow Republicans and single-handedly force the existing law to lapse Sunday at midnight, leading to dire warnings of threats to America.

The suspense continued Tuesday as McConnell tried to get the Senate to go along with three amendments he said would make the House bill more palatable. But House leaders warned that if presented with the changes the House might not be able to approve them.

The Senate denied McConnell's attempts, an embarrassment for the leader six months after Republicans retook Senate control.

The changes sought by McConnell included:

  • Lengthening the phase-out period of the bulk records program to a year from six months.
  • Requiring the director of national intelligence to certify that the NSA can effectively search records held by the phone companies.
  • Making phone companies notify the government if they change their policy on how long they hold the records.
  • Weakening the power of a new panel of outside experts created to advise the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

The final vote divided Senate Republicans, with 23 voting "yes" and 30 voting "no"; senators seeking re-election in 2016 split on the issue.

ACLU backs move

Civil liberties groups have been mixed on the legislation, but the ACLU applauded the vote, with deputy legal director Jameel Jaffer calling it "a milestone."

Snowden, now in Russia and reviled by lawmakers of both parties, addressed the vote via video link during an event hosted by Amnesty International. He said the legislation was historic because Americans are questioning long-held assumptions that intelligence officials always act in their best interest.

"For the first time in recent history, we found that despite the claims of government, the public made the final decision and that is a radical change we should seize on, we should value and we should push forward," he said.