Science

Nature should be at the heart of economic planning, says U.K. report

A report commissioned by the British government urges policymakers to stop measuring prosperity only in terms of gross domestic product and elevate nature and biodiversity as key in economic planning.

Policymakers urged to measure benefits of investing in forests, soils and oceans

Plastic waste is seen on the shore of a beach widened as a consequence of a severe drought, in the Argentine city of Rosario last August. Rosario sits on the banks of the Parana River Delta, one of the largest and most biodiverse in the world. (Marcelo Manera/AFP via Getty Images)

A report commissioned by the British government is urging a radical transformation in the way that countries around the world assess the state of their economies by elevating the natural world as a key element in their economic planning.

The review of the economics of biodiversity by Professor Partha Dasgupta concludes that nature needs to become as valued as traditional gauges of economic wealth such as profits in the future.

In the 600-page review that was commissioned in 2019 by Britain's Treasury, the University of Cambridge economist warned that current economic growth and prosperity have "come at a devastating cost to nature." He said declines in biodiversity and the environment's ability to provide food, clean water and air are "fuelling extreme risk and uncertainty for our economies and well-being."

The coronavirus pandemic and the associated economic calamity is just one illustration, he said, of what can happen when habitats are destroyed and species exploited.

"Nature is more than a mere economic good," he said. "Nature nurtures and nourishes us, so we will think of assets as durable entities that not only have use value, but may also have intrinsic worth."

Dasgupta called on the world to ensure demands on nature do not exceed sustainable supplies, by changing food production and consumption, investing in natural solutions such as restoring forests and protecting natural habitats. He said co-ordinated action now would in the long-run be less costly and would also help tackle other issues such as climate change and poverty,

Additionally, he pointed to a need to move away from using gross domestic product, or GDP, as a measure of economic success toward one that accounts for the benefits of investing in natural assets such as forests, soils and oceans.

GDP for short-run analysis

"As a measure of economic activity, GDP is indispensable in short-run macroeconomic analysis and management, but it is wholly unsuitable for appraising investment projects and identifying sustainable development," he said.

Responding to the report, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said the coming year is "critical" in efforts to stop and reverse declining biodiversity.

He said that the U.K., which is this year president of the Group of Seven leading economies and hosting the 26th global UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties, is "going to make sure the natural world stays right at the top of the global agenda."

Countries are also due to meet in China later this year to agree new efforts to tackle biodiversity declines.

In a foreword to the report, naturalist and broadcaster David Attenborough said economics was a discipline that shapes decisions of the "utmost consequence" and the review put biodiversity at its core.

He noted that humans, together with the livestock reared for consumption, constitute 96 per cent of the mass of all mammals on the planet, with the rest — from elephants to monkeys — accounting for just 4 per cent. He also pointed to the fact that 70 per cent of all birds alive are poultry, mostly chickens for human consumption.

"We are destroying biodiversity, the very characteristic that until recently enabled the natural world to flourish so abundantly," he said.

He said the report "shows us how, by bringing economics and ecology together, we can help save the natural world at what may be the last minute — and in doing so, save ourselves."