After Ontario doctors reject province's fee deal, what's next?
Ontario Medical Association wants to resume talks, but government doesn't have to bargain
Now that Ontario doctors have voted against a tentative agreement with the provincial government on physician fees, the two sides are heading into uncharted territory.
It's a bit like the Brexit vote for the U.K. to leave the European Union. Doctors voted no for a wide variety of reasons and may end up surprised by what happens next.
The government isn't obligated to negotiate fees with doctors. They aren't members of a union, they don't have an enshrined right to strike or to collective bargaining.
- 'Our line in the sand': Ontario doctors reject government's proposed fee deal
- Concerned Ontario Doctors leader calls tentative fee deal 'horrifying'
- Ontario doctors feel 'deceived' after government slashes fees
The province can simply go ahead and unilaterally set the fees paid by the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP).
Is that the next step for Health Minister Eric Hoskins? He certainly isn't ruling it out.
Asked by CBC News in Windsor Tuesday afternoon if he'll impose a deal, Hoskins replied: "I have always and still believe that an agreement is by far the best path forward. But it needs to be one that is fair to both sides and fair to Ontarians, and it needs to reflect the fiscal reality that we find ourselves in."
Meanwhile, the Ontario Medical Association is in crisis. Its leadership endorsed the tentative deal that was rejected by its members in a vote that saw 63.1 per cent against, and 36.9 per cent in favour. The OMA says it wants to get back to negotiations immediately in the wake of the "no" vote, but doctors know that Hoskins's next move could be to impose a fee agreement.
"We believe that we pressed the government as far as they would go," OMA president Dr. Virginia Walley told CBC Radio's Metro Morning on Tuesday.
Given that, how can doctors expect the province to cut them a sweeter deal now? "That's to be seen," Walley said. "I can't speculate on that."
The proposed agreement rejected by the doctors would have boosted the $11.5-billion OHIP fee-for-service budget by 2.5 per cent annually over its four-year term. Some doctors argue that this effectively amounts to a pay freeze, since the amount of services they have to perform is increasing as Ontario's population grows and ages.
What's important to note about the tentative deal is it would not have affected all physicians equally. A key provision is to "work together to jointly identify savings," particularly to "update" fees for services that can now be performed more quickly because of technological change. The best-paid specialists, including radiologists and ophthalmologists, figured this means their fees would be targeted. It's no coincidence those groups led the charge against the deal, along with some anesthesiologists.
They may end up targeted anyway. Successive Liberal governments have been quick to impose fee deals on doctors when bargaining runs aground.
In May 2012, after failing to reach an agreement in negotiations, the McGuinty government slashed OHIP fees for a host of services. The two sides eventually went back to the table and in November of that year reached a tentative agreement. OMA members voted 81 per cent in favour of that deal, even though it rolled back only six of the fee cuts.
Not long after that agreement expired, another round of negotiations failed to produce a deal and in January 2015 Hoskins imposed an across-the-board fee cut of 2.65 per cent, followed by another round of cuts that took effect in October.
Even the doctors who led the "no" campaign are uncertain whether Hoskins will impose a deal.
"I hope not," said Dr. Nadia Alam, a member of the group Concerned Ontario Doctors, in an interview on CBC Radio's Metro Morning. "The government spent the last week or two talking about how it wants to return to a trusting, collaborative relationship with the doctors. I certainly hope they're going to honour that statement."