Sudbury council approves 'slush fund' changes
Once again, a vote at Sudbury city hall has pitted the city councillors against the mayor.
Marianne Matichuk was the lone vote against proposed changes to the $50,000 city councillors each have to spend in their wards each year.
Matichuk said she likes the new rules that restrict the amount councillors can spend in one place, but thinks city staff should have more control on how the Healthy Community Funds are spent.
Mayor’s money
At Tuesday’s council meeting, Coun. Joscelyne Landry-Altmann asked for more information on how the mayor spends tax dollars in her office.
"I'll invite the mayor to post her employee salaries in terms of fulfilling the mandate of full accountability and transparency," Landry-Altmann said.
Matichuk said she'd be happy to share those numbers, as long as it doesn't violate any privacy or employment laws.
"As far as I'm concerned, no matter how much work has been done, I still disagree with the premise of this policy," she said.
However the 11 councillors at Tuesday night's meeting all voted to approve the new policy that does tighten up the rules on how the Healthy Community Funds are spent. In the past, critics have called the ward monies 'slush funds,' and have suggested they're illegal.
Although he voted in favour of the changes, Coun. Fabio Belli said he has concerns about the misspending of these ward funds. He said he believes problems arise when councillors choose to give money to certain community groups.
"When you give to one, you must give to others," Belli said.
"So, that's one of my biggest concerns. I will not spend any money towards any grants or donations. Plain and simple."
Belli said he will only give his ward funds to parks, playgrounds, trails and other recreational infrastructure.