Nova Scotia

Charges against spouse of Nova Scotia mass killer were 'lawful,' Crown says

In a statement of defence filed before the Nova Scotia Supreme Court, federal lawyers reject the accusation by Lisa Banfield that the RCMP conspired to stage a malicious prosecution against her.

Federal lawyers file statement of defence rejecting Lisa Banfield's accusation of malicious prosecution

A woman wearing a black shirt sits in front of a microphone.
Lisa Banfield, the partner of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the mass murders in rural Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax on Friday, July 15, 2022. Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer and driving a replica police cruiser, murdered 22 people. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

Federal lawyers say it was lawful and reasonable to charge the spouse of the man responsible for the Nova Scotia mass shooting for supplying him with ammunition.

Lawyer Patricia MacPhee made the argument in a written statement of defence before the Nova Scotia Supreme Court.

She rejects the accusation by Lisa Banfield that the RCMP conspired to stage a malicious prosecution against her.

Banfield is suing the provincial and federal governments over the charge of providing ammunition to her common-law spouse, Gabriel Wortman.

Wortman killed 22 people on April 18-19, 2020, using multiple firearms and driving a replica RCMP patrol car.

Banfield alleges she was charged in December 2020 because the RCMP wanted to deflect attention from mistakes police made during the response and investigation into the killings.

In her statement of claim, filed in October 2022, Banfield says her reputation and quality of life were damaged, and that she endured pain and suffering, loss of income, out-of-pocket expenses, legal fees and cost of care.

MacPhee says Banfield was cautioned during police interviews that statements about providing ammunition to her spouse could be used as evidence.

'Lawful, reasonable and just'

"Canada denies that the RCMP instigated a baseless investigation into the plaintiff's involvement in the mass casualty," reads the court document filed Jan. 31. "It was lawful, reasonable and just for the RCMP to investigate how the perpetrator acquired the firearms, associated equipment and ammunition to carry out the mass casualty."

Banfield was interviewed several times by RCMP investigators in 2020 — on April 19, 20 and 28, and again on Oct. 23. Her lawyers have said she was never told she could have a lawyer with her.

In the statement of defence, MacPhee says, "there was no duty on the RCMP to inform the plaintiff of her right to counsel."

"She had legal counsel since April 20, 2020, and it was her decision whether to have counsel present."

MacPhee says Banfield went through restorative justice after she was charged, and "ultimately accepted responsibility for the offence, effectively admitting the truth of the allegations against her, which defeats her claim of defamation against the RCMP."

The RCMP charged Banfield, her brother and brother-in-law with unlawfully transferring the killer ammunition, after they provided him with .223-calibre Remington cartridges and .40-calibre Smith and Wesson cartridges.

Police acknowledged at the time that the three had no knowledge of what the gunman would do, and the Crown withdrew the charges after the trio participated in a restorative justice program.