North

Government looking at changes to Nutrition North food subsidy

Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada has published a notice of proposed procurement for someone to 'develop subsidy models' and 'support an engagement with communities' for the Nutrition North program in 2015/2016.

Aboriginal Affairs has published notice of proposed procurement for 2015/2016

A price tag lists the cost of a jug of orange juice at a grocery store in Iqaluit, Nunavut on December 8, 2014. The federal government's $60-million food subsidy, Nutrition North, is only the latest of the proposed solutions that has stumbled under mismanagement and the enormity of the hunger problem. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)

It appears the Conservative government is open to the idea of changing the way it tries to offset the high cost of food in the North.

The department that oversees the beleaguered Nutrition North program has posted a notice of proposed procurement for someone to come up with different ways of providing northerners with the federal food subsidy.

"The Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development has a requirement to develop subsidy models and support an engagement with communities for the Nutrition North Canada Program in 2015-16," it says.

The notice, posted Monday, did not elaborate on the nature of any possible changes to Nutrition North. Neither the department nor Aboriginal Affairs Minister Bernard Valcourt's office has responded to questions about the posting.

The program — which replaced the old Food Mail program in 2011 — is intended to help defray the cost of nutritious food in the North by providing retailers with a subsidy that they are supposed to pass on by cutting food costs for consumers.

But the $60-million annual food subsidy has been under scrutiny ever since auditor general Michael Ferguson's fall report in November. The audit revealed that Aboriginal Affairs is largely in the dark about whether Nutrition North actually does anything for the people who need it the most.

That's partly because the department has not required merchants to report their profit margins, which over time would indicate whether the full subsidy is being passed on to consumers.

Ferguson's team also heard that sometimes the subsidy exceeds the very shipping costs it is meant to defray. 

The department now says that as of April 1, retailers will have to provide information on their current and long-term profit margins.

The audit also flagged another glaring problem with the subsidy. 

Nutrition North gives retailers a subsidy based on the weight of eligible foods shipped to eligible communities. However, the auditor general found Aboriginal Affairs choose eligible communities based not on need, but on whether they had year-round road access and if they had used the Food Mail program.

Aboriginal Affairs told Ferguson's team it has looked at expanding the full subsidy to around 50 fly-in northern communities, but doing so would increase the cost of the program by $7 million a year.