NL

Dams like Muskrat Falls produce more greenhouse gas than expected: study

Some scientists are questioning whether energy produced by man-made dams is as green as previously believed.

Methane another pollutant with big environmental impact, scientist says

Bridget Deemer, the first author on the study, is an aquatic biogeochemist, reservoir limnologist and PhD student at Washington State University. (Submitted)

Some scientists are questioning whether energy produced by man-made dams is as green as previously believed.

A study published recently in the monthly journal BioScience says carbon pollution from reservoirs — like the one soon to be flooded at Muskrat Falls — deserves more consideration.

Methane is biggest contributor

An aerial shot of the Muskrat Falls site in September 2016. (Nalcor Energy)

The research looked at a hundred pre-existing studies, that covered greenhouse emissions from different types of reservoirs.

"The rate of methane emission from these reservoirs was about 25% higher than what was previously thought," Bridget Deemer, the first author on the study, told CBC's Labrador Morning.

"That means acre-for-acre … these systems are having a bigger impact on the global greenhouse gas budget than we previously thought."

The report found 79% of a dam's greenhouse effect was a result of methane. Carbon dioxide, at 17 per cent, and nitrous oxide at 4 per cent make up remaining emissions.

Muskrat Falls wasn't studied as part of Greenhouse gas emissions from reservoirs: a new global synthesis but scientist Bridgette Deemer says a "working hypothesis" suggests clearing vegetation from its reservoir would reduce the amount methane released by the project. (Nalcor Energy)

Methane, which is formed primarily by rotting organic matter, has a short life in the atmosphere but has the stronger short-term warming effect of the three gasses.

'Working hypothesis' around clearing

While Muskrat Falls in particular wasn't studied, Deemer said she had a "working hypothesis" about how clearing vegetation prior to flooding would impact the amount of greenhouse gases emitted from the project.

We can't think of these systems as greenhouse neutral.- Bridget Deemer, study author

"I would think that [clearing] might reduce methane emissions," the aquatic biogeochemist and reservoir limnologist said.

"But it remains to be tested."

Emissions need to be calculated 

Although hydroelectric projects generally have a better reputation than the oil and gas energy production industry, Deemer says emissions from all reservoirs should be calculated into the global carbon budget.

"We can't think of these systems as greenhouse neutral," she said.

"We need to be considering their emission when we're making management decisions either about building new reservoirs or how we're managing existing systems."