Early New Brunswick election call was legal, court tells activist
Democracy Watch challenge to Higgs's call for an election in August 2020 borders on frivolous, judge says
A legal challenge to the early election call by Premier Blaine Higgs in August 2020 has been thrown out of court.
Activist Duff Conacher of Democracy Watch had asked the Court of Queen's Bench to rule that Higgs violated the province's fixed-date election requirements when he triggered the election.
But Justice Thomas Christie says in his ruling that the legislation explicitly does not take away the power of the lieutenant-governor to dissolve the legislature when a premier asks her or him to do so.
"Her discretion to dissolve the Legislative Assembly remains intact," Christie writes, adding the Democracy Watch challenge "borders on being considered frivolous."
He also writes that Conacher's concern that Higgs called the election to take advantage of political circumstances wasn't enough to warrant the lawsuit.
"In a political system dominated by party politics, elections called for partisan reasons could hardly be a basis for overturning one," Christie wrote. "At the end of the day, the voters are better placed to decide the wisdom of such action."
What existing legislation allows
The amendments to the Legislative Assembly Act, passed in 2007, set a date for the next scheduled provincial election based on when the previous one was held.
Under the law's formulation, an election was due Oct. 17, 2022. Higgs visited Lt.-Gov. Brenda Murphy on Aug. 17, 2020, more than two years early.
The Progressive Conservative government was riding high in the polls at the time, in part because of the province's low COVID-19 case numbers. Higgs didn't have a majority in the legislature, but he secured one when New Brunswickers voted on Sept. 14, 2020.
The law itself says "nothing in this section" takes away from the lieutenant-governor's power and discretion under the Constitution to dissolve the legislature.
Precedence in court
In their arguments on Conacher's case, government lawyers quoted from a Liberal cabinet minister making the same point during debate on the bill in 2007.
Christie's decision also points out that Conacher lost when he filed a similar lawsuit over Prime Minister Stephen Harper's calling of an early election in 2008. A challenge of an early Alberta election was also rejected by courts there.
The judge says he asked Conacher's lawyer to show how the New Brunswick case was different from the others, and the lawyer admitted there was no major difference.
"The advice of a Premier or Prime Minister to the Lieutenant Governor or Governor General, regarding the calling of an election, is an executive prerogative beyond the proper role of the courts to displace," Christie wrote.
He also rapped Conacher for an affidavit that he says was based largely on the activist's "personal opinions and conjecture" rather than facts.
"The interests he raises in the name of the 'public's interest' are, in reality, his personal interests or concerns," Christie wrote.
With Higgs's early election last year, the next vote is now scheduled for Oct. 21, 2024.