Lac-Mégantic train disaster: U.S. judge approves settlement for victims
Settlement was the product of negotiations with about two dozen companies
A U.S. bankruptcy judge has approved a $446 million Cdn settlement fund for victims of the fiery Lac-Mégantic oil-train derailment in Quebec that killed 47 people.
Judge Peter Cary in Portland, Maine, announced his decision Friday after Canadian Pacific dropped its objection to the settlement moving forward and a Canadian judge gave conditional approval.
- Rail tanker car guidelines announced by Canada, U.S.
- Lac-Mégantic cleanup companies still waiting to get paid
The settlement was the result of negotiations with about two dozen companies.
Barring any surprises, payments could be made to victims of the disaster by year's end, said Robert Keach, the bankruptcy trustee. About $83 million is being set aside to settle wrongful death claims.
"We're very happy for the victims that we were able to get to this point. They're the primary focus here," Keach said.
A runaway train with 72 oil tankers derailed on July 6, 2013, in Lac-Mégantic, Que., setting off powerful explosions and causing fires that wiped out much of the downtown.
The disaster led to greater regulatory scrutiny of the use of trains to transport crude oil amid a production surge thanks to new technologies including hydraulic fracturing.
After the fires were doused, the train's operator, Montreal, Maine and Atlantic, filed for bankruptcy, and the settlement fund is tied to those bankruptcy proceedings in the U.S. and Canada. The fund was the product of negotiations with about two dozen companies with potential liability.
Canadian Pacific owned the track where the crude oil shipment originated and contended it bore no responsibility, since the train that derailed had a Montreal, Maine and Atlantic locomotive and crew and was operating on MMA rail.
But Keach argued Canadian Pacific bears some responsibility for failing to properly classify the Bakken region crude oil, which was as volatile as gasoline.
Canadian Pacific isn't contributing to the settlement fund, and the railroad had contended the plan would have hampered its ability to defend itself from lawsuits, because the agreement provided legal immunity only to companies that do contribute.
But the altered amendment calls for a "judgment reduction provision" that would take into account the full settlement paid by others if Canadian Pacific is ordered to pay damages in the future.
"Although CP was not at fault in the derailment, we have been working with the trustee for a solution that protects CP interests and allows payments to be made to victims as soon as possible," said Canadian Pacific spokesman Martin Cej.