Manitoba·Analysis

Election fact-checker: Does the NDP jobs promise hold up?

As part of an ongoing effort to hold political leaders accountable, CBC News is fact-checking comments and promises made by party leaders at various times along the campaign trail.

While $6.64B may sustain 50,000 construction jobs, $680M in new money can't create the same amount of work

NDP leader Wab Kinew claims he can create 50,000 new jobs by spending an extra $680 million over four years. The job-creation formula cited by his party suggests that extra money would create something in the vicinity of 5,000 to 7,500 new jobs. (Jeff Stapleton/CBC)

South of the border, U.S. President Donald Trump loves to talk about "jobs, jobs, jobs."

Manitoba's political leaders appear to have a similar fixation in this provincial election campaign.

First, the Progressive Conservatives promised to create 40,000 new private-sector jobs. Then the New Democrats pledged to create 50,000.

As part of an ongoing effort to hold political leaders accountable, CBC News is fact-checking comments and promises made by party leaders at various times along the campaign trail. Comments made by politicians at campaign events, as well as in press releases, may be rated as true, false, or muddy, in CBC News fact-checker articles.

Here's a check of the NDP's big jobs promise on Wednesday — as well as a PC claim about a tourism pledge:

Claim by Manitoba NDP Leader Wab Kinew, Aug. 21

The claim: "Today I'm very proud to announce our commitment to spend $6.6 billion in strategic infrastructure investments so we can create 50,000 good new jobs during our first term in government."

Rating: Muddy as a bucket full of Red River water.

Here's why: With a pledge to spend $6.64 billion over four years on strategic infrastructure, the NDP are effectively promising to spend about $170 million more per year on strategic infrastructure — that is, roads, bridges, buildings, airport runways and other construction works — than the Tories plan to spend in this fiscal year's budget.

In and of itself, the pledge to spend more money is no problem, though it will make it more difficult for an NDP government to balance the provincial books within four years, as leader Wab Kinew has pledged.

The bigger problem is the Trump-like claim about creating 50,000 new jobs with that spending.

"It is an excellent number. It's a tremendous number. It's a number that we're very proud to announce here today," Kinew said on Wednesday.  

"I studied economics. That was my first degree, and I can tell you that there is a standard formula that every public accounts department uses when they calculate the job creation rate per dollar invested on infrastructure."  

The standard formula cited by the NDP suggests governments can create somewhere in the range of 7.5 to 11 jobs for every $1 million spent on strategic infrastructure. This belief explains why governments sometimes borrow money to pay for infrastructure in order to stimulate economic growth.

The problem with Kinew's claim is the NDP leader is counting on all of his proposed infrastructure spending to account for the creation of 50,000 "new jobs" and not just the additional money he plans to spend, over and above the 2019-2020 PC benchmark of $1.49 billion for strategic infrastructure.

Kinew is in effect planning to spend an additional $680 million over four years. The formula cited by his party, therefore, would create somewhere in the vicinity of 5,000 to 7,500 new jobs over four years, not 50,000.

The NDP can only get to 50,000 jobs by suggesting every single loonie in their proposed $6.64-billion pot is a new loonie. But that would only be the case if the Tories spent nothing — that is, zero dollars — on strategic infrastructure this year. Or if you consider every construction job a new job every January.

Kinew could claim, credibly, that his pledge would pay for 50,000 jobs. But the vast majority of those jobs would not be new.

It would be nigh-impossible to create 50,000 new construction-industry jobs by spending an additional $680 million on infrastructure. That would amount to roughly doubling the size of Manitoba's construction labour force by only spending 11.5 per cent more on infrastructure.

"I don't see how they can create that amount of employment with that level of investment," said Darryl Harrison, policy and research manager for the Winnipeg Construction Association.

"I don't think it's possible," added Chris Lorenc of the Manitoba Heavy Construction Association.

It isn't — because the NDP made it clear the entire $6.64-billion kitty would be used for this purpose, not just the additional $680 million. Few people would buy the argument every construction job becomes a "new job" when the calendar flips over from New Year's Eve to New Year's Day.

This Inukshuk stands alongside Hudson Bay in Churchill, Manitoba, one of the premier tourist destinations in the province. The PCs increased funding to promote tourism. (Cameron MacIntosh/CBC)

Claim by Manitoba PC Leader Brian Pallister, Aug. 21

The claim: "Over the past four years, we have increased support for tourism by 71 per cent compared to the NDP's final term in office."

Rating: True.

Here's why: When PC leader Brian Pallister spoke about "support for tourism," he meant support for Travel Manitoba, the arm's length agency that promotes the province.

His claim is based on simple arithmetic. The last NDP government budget, for the 2015-2016 fiscal year, called for $7 million worth of support for Travel Manitoba.

The most recent PC government budget calls for $12.1 million in spending on Travel Manitoba. That's actually a 73-per-cent increase.

Sign up for CBC Manitoba's newsletter for insight into the latest election news. Every week until the campaign ends, we'll send you a roundup of what you need to know. 

With files from Jacques Marcoux, Kristin Annable and Austin Grabish