British Columbia

B.C. grapples with future of Site C, as Premier Horgan sends ministers north

Decision day approaches as the deadline to decide on Site C's fate approaches. B.C.'s independent energy regulator concluded the dam is over budget and behind schedule.

Moment of truth approaching for controversial multi-billion dollar hydro-electric project

Bob Peever of BC Hydro gives a tour of the Site C Dam location near Fort St. John in April, 2017. The dam's completion would flood 5,500 hectares of the Peace River Valley and provide energy to power the equivalent of around 500,000 homes. (Jonathon Hayward/Canadian Press)

The fate of the largest public project in British Columbia's history, the Site C hydroelectric dam, will be the focus of intense scrutiny this week as provincial cabinet ministers travel north for last-minute consultations.

The New Democrats promised to decide Site C's fate by the end of the year after a review by the B.C. Utilities Commission, the province's independent energy regulator, concluded the dam is over budget and behind schedule.

The Site C Dam location is seen along the Peace River in Fort St. John, B.C., Tuesday, April 18, 2017. The fate of the largest public project in British Columbia's history, the $8.3 billion Site C hydroelectric dam, will be the focus of intense scrutiny in the coming days. (Jonathan Hayward/Canadian Press)

Construction work on the $8.3 billion project began near Fort St. John in the northeastern part of the province more than two years ago.

Heat is on

The heat is on, said Premier John Horgan, who is sending his ministers of Indigenous relations and energy to the region for consultations with First Nations and community representatives this week.

Horgan said he will continue to crunch numbers and try to decide what's best for rate payers.

"This is not an easy choice. This is not an easy decision," he said. "We're going to be grappling with it for the next couple of weeks. I'm not underestimating the challenge ahead of me."

Deciding the project's future is the first major test of the minority New Democrats, who have said it will impact the entire province. Site C has been marked by environmental, economic, technological and Indigenous rights concerns that have become the front lines of political battles in the province.

Construction work on the $8.3 billion Site C dam began more than two years ago. (Jonathon Hayward/THE CANADIAN PRESS)

"I, now as the leader of the government, have to look at what the consequences are of what our decision will be going forward," Horgan said.

Environmental studies expert Karen Bakker said the utilities commission's recent report shows the project's cost could grow to $12 billion, all to provide energy that isn't required.

Money sink?

"It's a very expensive project," said Bakker, who led a team at the University of British Columbia that produced five reports on Site C. "That's the conundrum the province is facing. This could be a huge money sink for the province."

The utilities commission was asked by the NDP government to confirm whether Crown-owned BC Hydro is on target to complete construction of Site C on budget and by 2024. It was also asked to provide advice on three possible outcomes: proceeding with the project, suspending construction until 2024 or terminating it.

The commission concluded suspending and restarting the project in 2024 is the least attractive option, and would add at least $3.6 billion to the price tag.

The B.C. Utilities Commission concluded suspending and restarting the project in 2024 is the least attractive option for the province, and would add at least $3.6 billion to the price tag. (Jonathan Hayward/Canadian Press)

The review didn't make a recommendation on whether the province should proceed with or cancel the dam, but said terminating Site C would cost $1.8 billion while completing it could cost more than $10 billion.

Viable energy alternatives

The commission also said there are viable alternative energy sources, including wind, geothermal and industrial curtailment, that could provide similar benefits with an equal or lower cost.

"The commission's report is very clear that there are high economic risks," Bakker said.

She said the project also faces potential lawsuits from Indigenous groups.

But Liberal Mike Bernier, who represents the Dawson Creek area near the dam, said killing Site C would result in the province losing $4 billion, with nothing to show for its investment.

He said more than 2,000 people are currently working on the dam and their jobs are now under threat.

"Site C is a generational opportunity to help the province grow, give us cheap renewable power and have opportunities for my kids and everybody else's kids," Bernier said. "To me that's why this project is something I'm fighting for because I see the opportunities of building our province."