Business

Capital gains tax increase delayed until 2026, federal government confirms

The federal government confirmed on Friday it's reversing course on increases to the capital gains tax that were announced in the last federal budget after initial reporting from CBC News on Thursday.

Liberals walk back tax hikes by deferring increase until after the next federal election

A sign, slightly obscured by barren branches from a bush, reads "Canada Revenue Agency, National Headquarters."
The Canada Revenue Agency had already been collecting higher capital gains tax based on changes that were never passed in legislation; the federal government now says those changes will not happen at all. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

The federal government confirmed on Friday that it's reversing course on increases to the capital gains tax first announced in the last federal budget.

The government is delaying the effective date of the increase to Jan. 1, 2026.

After initial reporting from CBC News on Thursday that federal Liberals were considering a pause on collecting the new taxes, Finance Minister Dominic LeBlanc confirmed as much in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. 

"This deferral will provide certainty to Canadian taxpayers," posted LeBlanc.

The delay almost certainly pushes the change until after the next federal election, which could effectively kill the tax increase given that it has been opposed by the Conservative Party.

"It is a surprise," said Dan Kelly, president of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB), when interviewed on Thursday night. The industry lobby group had opposed the increase to capital gains taxes since they were first announced.

"But it is welcome news," he said.

A man in a collared shirt and jacket sits in front of a poster that reads "Canadian Federation of Independent Business."
CFIB president Dan Kelly said he "won't breathe a full sigh of relief just yet" until there are more details about what's to come. (CBC)

'Fairness for every generation'

The changes had been considered a core part of the last federal budget, which was branded as a plan bringing "fairness for every generation."

It proposed increasing taxes on capital gains above $250,000 for individuals, changing what is called the "inclusion rate" from one-half to two-thirds for them.

All capital gains for corporations and trusts would have increased to two-thirds as well.

When the measure was introduced, the finance minister at the time, Chrystia Freeland, said it was intended to address what she called issues of tax fairness. Freeland had previously said the government needed the revenue from the changes to fund programs like pharmacare, dental care, child care and the green energy transition.

Freeland has since disavowed her signature tax policy, as she seeks the Liberal leadership.

WATCH | Who's telling the truth about the capital gains tax?: 

Who’s telling the truth about the capital gains tax? | About That

8 months ago
Duration 15:07
Canada's capital gains tax increase comes into effect on June 25. Andrew Chang breaks down some misleading claims about the changes coming from both sides of the political aisle and explains who is likely to pay the new tax, how much and how often. Does it really just hit the ultra-rich?

But economist Jim Stanford criticized the delay on this policy.

"It was fair, and it would raise revenue that was needed for important things like affordable housing or dental care or pharmacare," said Stanford, director of the Centre for Future Work in Vancouver.

"The only people who will benefit from the government backtracking on capital gains taxation is a tiny group of corporations and very wealthy investors," he said on Thursday, before the change was made official.

If the increase in capital gains were to stay, he said it would be a "small" move toward a more fair tax system.

The proposed increases were unpopular with business groups, including many in the technology and medical sectors.

A woman stands on a sidewalk talking to a reporter.
Deborah Yedlin, president of the Calgary Chamber of Commerce, said the capital gains taxes should not have been increased in the first place. (Jo Horwood/CBC)

"We shouldn't have been here in the first place," said Deborah Yedlin, president of the Calgary Chamber of Commerce in an emailed statement to CBC News on Thursday evening.

She said it's "unclear at this point" how a change will be enacted, and reiterated the Chamber's position that higher capital gains taxes can discourage investors.

"Increasing the capital gains inclusion rate is a negative signal for investment," wrote Yedlin, whose organization has expressed concern that higher taxes on corporations and trusts would make it more difficult for businesses to invest gains or profits in new opportunities. 

Stanford disagreed, telling CBC News he did not believe, as an economist, that the capital gains increase caused investment to drop, and said "backing away from it will make zero difference" to how well Canada attracts investment.

He pointed to other factors causing potential economic sluggishness.

"There is no doubt that there are question marks over Canada right now, mostly because of Donald Trump's tariffs," he said.

Increase was already being collected

The CRA had been collecting the increased tax rate already, as if it had taken effect, even though the relevant legislation had not been passed and was functionally dead after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau prorogued Parliament.

This is standard practice, the federal agency said earlier this month. 

"Parliamentary convention dictates that taxation proposals are effective as soon as the government tables a notice of ways and means motion; this approach provides consistency and fairness in the treatment of all taxpayers," it said in a statement to CBC News.

CBC News has reached out to government officials for details on what could happen to any capital gains tax increases already collected.

The current announcement from the government indicates that it intends for the increase to still take effect in 2026.

But lobby groups such as the CFIB are hoping this backtrack ends up being permanent.

"I'm not going to breathe a full sigh of relief just yet — until we know that this proposal has effectively been killed," said Kelly. "Right now, I would describe it as being on life support."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Anis Heydari

Senior Reporter

Anis Heydari is a senior reporter covering business and economics for CBC News. Prior to that, he was on the founding team of CBC Radio's "The Cost of Living" and has also reported for NPR's "The Indicator from Planet Money." He's lived and worked in Edmonton, Edinburgh, southwestern Ontario and Toronto, and is currently based in Calgary. Email him at anis@cbc.ca.

With files from Peter Armstrong