U.S. tariffs on Canada: (Almost) nobody wants this, except the guy who really does

Business leaders, experts, even other Republicans dislike the import taxes Trump threatens

Image | Trump Inauguration

Caption: U.S. President Donald Trump talks to reporters as he signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, Jan. 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Evan Vucci/The Associated Press)

This may give some solace to Canadians dreading the impact of large across-the-board U.S. tariffs: you're not alone in your sentiment.
The idea remains deeply unpopular among residents of the country whose new president is threatening to erect the economically harsh trade barriers. Polls by Leger(external link) and the Associated Press/NORC(external link) in January both found that only 29 per cent of Americans want tariffs on all imports.
That includes not just a significant (though non-majority) chunk of supporters of Donald Trump's own Republican Party, but also many of its key figures.
Avowed libertarian Senator Rand Paul and more traditional establishment Republican Mitch McConnell don't always see eye to eye, but both Kentucky senators(external link) have warned that(external link) Trump's broad-based tariff idea is a bad one that will cause prices to rise for American consumers.
Big business may cheer on deregulation and much of what Trump pitches, but opposes tariffs, with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce(external link) warning last year his 25 per cent rates on all Mexico and Canadian imports would ding the typical family more than $1,000, "with significant harm to U.S. manufacturers, farmers and ranchers."
The retail sector is also worried about the tariff-on-everything approach(external link).
And if you imagine the U.S. oil industry is buoyed by Trump's claims that "we don't need their oil and gas," then you'd be misunderstanding how integrated Canadian producers and U.S. refineries are — and a top petroleum lobby's president reportedly wants its neighbours' oil exports shielded(external link) from Trump's trade actions.
WATCH | CBC breaks down what the U.S. president really wants from Canada:

Media | The National : Tariff threats: What does Trump want from Canada?

Caption: With U.S. President Donald Trump threatening economy-crushing tariffs, The National’s Adrienne Arsenault asks CBC’s Alex Panetta and Catherine Cullen to break down what Trump really wants from Canada.

Open Full Embed in New Tab (external link)Loading external pages may require significantly more data usage.
It's not different from the widespread condemnation(external link) from business groups and Republican politicians alike when Trump imposed tariffs on Canadian aluminum and steel in 2018 in his last presidential term, when they were branded a "tax hike on Americans."
In 2025, with more of the conservative movement remade in Trump's image than in his first presidency, it remains hard to find voices south of the border who view Trump's tariffs as a great idea. The key exception, of course, is the decision-maker himself, who's repeatedly boasted they will "make our country rich."
It's hard to find any experts who will back him up on that. Not even from the conservative realm of think-tanks: including the Cato Institute(external link), the American Enterprise Institute — "Anyone willing to tell the president his tariff plans are risky, for him?" one scholar wrote(external link) Thursday — and Stanford University's Hoover Institution(external link), from which Trump plucked economics fellow Kevin Hassett(external link) as his director of the National Economic Council.
As a symbol of the cross-partisan accord on this front, Bill Clinton's former Treasury secretary and Republican ex-senator Phil Gramm co-wrote a Wall Street Journal missive(external link) against tariffs and encouraged other economists to sign on, in the spirit of the more than 1,000 U.S. economists who inked a letter pleading against the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which many argue worsened the Great Depression.
"The old line is that economists disagree about everything," David Henderson of the Hoover Institution told CBC News. "But on tariffs there's almost total consensus that high tariffs are bad. And this 25 per cent tariff is a high tariff."
It was telling in that veteran economist's mind that when he heard that Trump named tariff advocate Stephen Miran as chair of Council of Economic Advisers, Henderson had never heard of the guy. Nor had most of his friends in trade economics, Henderson said.
In a paper(external link) Miran wrote last fall, he argued that tariff rates at 20 per cent are "optimal" for U.S. revenue and overall welfare, while anything up to 50 per cent won't be harmful. However, he also offered this proviso, to be perhaps thrown into the churning debate about Canada's fight-back strategy: "Retaliatory tariffs by other nations can nullify the welfare benefits of tariffs for the U.S."

Image | Cda Tariffs Reax 20180531

Caption: The bulk of the business groups and economists joined congressional Republicans in criticizing Trump's tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum in 2018. (Tara Walton/CP)

(Miran is a fellow with the Manhattan Institute, where his pro-tariff views are not widely shared, if headlines like "Why the deep state loves tariffs(external link)" and "Economists are wrong a lot, but not about tariffs(external link)" are anything to go by.)
But Trump has been able to surround himself with individuals like Miran who help back up the president's own zeal for slapping import taxes on other countries' goods. His incoming secretaries of Treasury(external link) and Commerce(external link) have backed his vision to varying degrees, while Hassett downplayed the wide fears of price shocks on Fox Business this week.
"When the people who are trying to cause panic over President Trump's trade policy simulate what it's going to do, they don't account for all the other policies," he said.
"So President Trump is drill, baby, drill, and deregulate and tax cuts and reduce spending."
While Trump has praised the late-19th-century tariffs of Republican president William McKinley(external link), the party has, since the 1950s, been the side that backed free trade over protectionist impulses, Henderson says. That could explain why the conservative economic orthodoxy is so firmly against Team Tariff.
But when Henderson spoke to a Libertarian Party chapter event in California last week, he says it struck him that many of the Trump supporters in the crowd seemed to be skeptical of his points about trade. Trump's "cult of personality" has brought his fans' attitudes into alignment with his own, and much of the Republican voter base along with it.

Image | CANADA-POLITICS/

Caption: A new top economic advisor to Trump has extolled the virtues of tariffs for the United States. But he's written that retaliatory measures from Canada or other countries would 'nullify' the benefits. (Blair Gable/Reuters)

An Ipsos poll(external link) for Reuters conducted after Trump's Jan. 20 inauguration showed a clear majority of Americans remain opposed to tariffs on Canadian goods — including 88 per cent of Democrats and 66 per cent of independents — but only 37 per cent of Republicans disagree with tariffs at the northern border.
One could look at that in two ways: On one hand, most of his party still wants him to forge ahead and launch a potential trade war. On the other hand, close to two-fifths of his very own party believes he's on the wrong track.
In the Leger survey, even a majority of the respondents who were members of Trump's party say that tariffs will increase the price of goods and services in their country.
And that's before they're in place, and all the warnings from economists and oil lobbyists and traditional politicians potentially come to pass and hit Americans' wallets.
"Whatever people thought, if they see the price of gasoline going up 15 to 20 cents a gallon, they might wonder," Henderson says.
LISTEN | Economist Oren Cass supports tariffs to bring jobs back to U.S.:

Media | The Current : This U.S. economist is pushing for tariffs on Canada

Caption: Economist Oren Cass has been pushing for a new economic strategy in Washington, and supports the sweeping tariffs that could be imposed on Canada this weekend. He says those tariffs will hurt in the short term, but thinks they’re ultimately necessary to bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. — and rebuild the U.S. trade relationship with the rest of the world.

Open Full Embed in New Tab (external link)Loading external pages may require significantly more data usage.