The House

Anti-terrorism legislation review begins

The controversial anti-terrorism bill has now gone through one week of committee review. Has the government showed signs that amendments are possible? Legal scholars Craig Forcese and Kent Roach join us with their take on week one.
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Minister Steven Blaney and Justice Minsiter Peter MacKay appear at the Commons public safety committee hearing witnesses on Bill C-51, Anti-terrorism Act on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Tuesday March 10, 2015. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

The first week of testimonies at the committee looking into the controversial anti-terrorism bill is now in the books. Despite the growing list of red flags being raised by critics, the government appears unwilling to entertain changes to Bill C-51.

MacKay: there is oversight RAW

10 years ago
Duration 3:54
Justice Minister Peter MacKay cites judicial oversight, Attorney General consent, SIRC, and reporting to Parliament while testifying in front of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security.

To help review what happened this week, we invited two of the people who appeared. Craig Forcese is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law at the University of Ottawa and Kent Roach is a professor of Law at the University of Toronto who specializes in constitutional and terrorism law.

They've been posting detailed legal analyses of Bill C-51 at www.antiterrorlaw.ca .