Biden's warning to Iran: Don't expand war with Israel

U.S. response to weekend attack on Israel speaks to concerns of spiralling crisis

Image | AP Poll Biden Israel

Caption: The U.S. is warning Israel's rivals not to take advantage of this moment. There's a message there for Iran and its proxies. (Oded Balilty/The Associated Press)

Americans are redeploying thousands of sailors, warplanes and the country's most advanced aircraft carrier in an effort to keep a powder keg from exploding across the Middle East.
That shift of resources toward the eastern Mediterranean is intended as a message of reassurance to Israel. It's also a warning to one country in particular: Iran.
Washington is nervously watching Israel's northern border for signs of a second front of attack, and evidence of a co-ordinated assault on the Jewish state by different Iran-backed militias.
The U.S. is strongly hinting that such a move could drag it into the conflict in defence of Israel. U.S. officials made clear Tuesday their aircraft carrier is there in case new parties join the war.
"To any country, any organization, anyone thinking of taking advantage of the situation, I have one word: Don't," President Joe Biden said Tuesday at the White House.
"Let there be no doubt: the United States has Israel's back."

No sign of 'nightmare scenario' yet

There is no evidence yet, beyond isolated skirmishes in the north, of the U.S.'s nightmare scenario taking shape: An escalated war that creates pressure for it to become involved.
In the meantime, however, the U.S. is taking steps abroad and at home, where support for Israel has historically been strong, despite recent softening from younger, left-leaning Americans.
It is sending munitions to Israel and shifting the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier group(external link) closer to the conflict.
It's also co-ordinating intelligence with Israel in an effort to rescue dozens of hostages held by Palestinian militants. The White House believes U.S. citizens are among those captured by Hamas during weekend terrorist attacks; at least 14 Americans are dead, and up to 20 are unaccounted for.
The U.S. moves are intended to send two messages, said Thomas Juneau, an Iran expert at the University of Ottawa.
To Israel, he said, the message is: "We have your back." To Israel's enemies, notably the Hezbollah militia and its patron, Iran, it's a warning: "We [the U.S.] may join in the fight."

Image | Lebanon Israel Palestinians

Caption: The flashpoint people fear: Israel's northern border with Lebanon, where Iran-backed Hezbollah has a large arsenal. That border is seen here Monday, with Lebanese soldiers and a man waving Palestinian and Hezbollah flags overlooking the Israeli town of Metula. (Mohammed Zaatari/The Associated Press)

On the domestic front, the U.S. is weighing a series of actions — including by Congress, by the administration and by police — with the FBI increasing monitoring at Jewish sites amid bomb threats(external link) at Utah synagogues.
Aaron David Miller, a former U.S. Middle East negotiator, expressed optimism that a broader multinational war will be avoided. Iran, he said, likely has no interest in an escalating conflict that pits it directly against Israel, and risks pulling in the Americans.
Still, Miller predicted an extremely violent period for Israelis and Palestinians — and there's little the U.S. can do to change that.
WATCH | Rescuers search for survivors as Israel-Hamas conflict escalates:

Media Video | CBC News : 'This is what they mean by human tragedy,' Biden says of Hamas attacks

Caption: U.S. President Joe Biden says Israel has the right to respond — 'indeed, has the duty to respond' — to the 'vicious' attacks launched against it by Hamas.

Open Full Embed in New Tab (external link)Loading external pages may require significantly more data usage.
"This is going to get worse before it gets worse," the former State Department official told CBC News over the weekend.
"American leverage, frankly, is limited."
He said it takes three things to achieve diplomatic peace: two parties willing and able to negotiate, a real sense of shared urgency and an agreed-upon goal.
None of these conditions, Miller said, currently exist between an Israeli government he described as extreme right-wing, and the Palestinian organization Hamas, which he called "brutal" and "savage."
"I see no way the United States will be able to shape and affect that."

Image | NORWAY-MILITARY/US

Caption: One of the world's newest, largest aircraft carriers, the USS Gerald R. Ford, seen here earlier this year, is being deployed to the eastern Mediterranean along with surrounding battle ships. (Hakon Mosvold Larsen/Reuters)

U.S. support for Israel from the start

The U.S. has been Israel's longest-standing and most important ally, becoming the first country to recognize the Jewish state a mere 11 minutes after its creation in 1948.
Americans already supply Israel with just under one-fifth of its military funding and have a longstanding policy of selling their best, newest military equipment(external link) to Israel first.
Congress is now weighing additional aid for Israel's military, possibly as part of a broader legislative package to help pass new Ukraine funding. Top Senate Republican Mitch McConnell(external link), meanwhile, has proposed a series of new sanctions against Iran.
Political opinion in the U.S. will almost certainly back additional support for Israel.
Americans have long been, and still are, likelier to express pro-Israeli than views than pro-Palestinian ones in public opinion polls.
But that support is not monolithic, especially lately.
WATCH | What happened Monday in the Israeli-Hamas conflict:

Media Video | Rescuers search for survivors after Israeli airstrikes hit Gaza

Caption: Palestinians in Gaza gathered in front of a destroyed house to look for survivors after airstrikes from Israel targeted several areas on Monday.

Open Full Embed in New Tab (external link)Loading external pages may require significantly more data usage.
Trend lines(external link) show a noticeable decline in support for Israel among Democrats(external link). Young(external link) Democrats, in particular, are now more likely to express pro-Palestinian views and denounce the stalled statehood process under right-wing Israeli governments.
That tension within the Democratic Party was illustrated at a weekend rally in Boston. At the pro-Israel event, a progressive senator, Ed Markey, was booed for mentioning his hope of de-escalation in the conflict.
Another speaker, fellow Democrat Jake Auchincloss, was cheered(external link) at the same event for brushing off such talk: "Now is not the time for equivocation," he added in a written statement(external link). "Calls for de-escalation, even if well-meaning, are premature."
Yet, in his speech, he referred to a potential drag on U.S. support, at least temporarily: paralysis in the U.S. Congress.

Image | Israel Palestinians US Reactions

Caption: Americans' pro-Israel lean is reflected in numerous opinion polls over the years. But that view is softening among young Democrats, especially, who increasingly denounce what they view as persistent human-rights abuses inflicted against Palestinians. That view is reflected here in a protest outside the White House on Sunday. (Manuel Balce Ceneta/The Associated Press)

Turmoil in D.C.: No Congress, no ambassador

There won't be any legislation, of any kind, passing through Congress for at least a few days, whether it's military funding for Israel or anything else.
That's because the House of Representatives is currently leaderless, in the hands of a caretaker Speaker after a rebellion last week by Republicans.
And in the Senate, there's a backlog of diplomatic and military appointments waiting to be confirmed to their posts.
That includes the ambassador to Jerusalem.
The U.S. does not have an ambassador to Israel. Former treasury secretary Jack Lew was nominated(external link) to fill the vacant position and there's now talk about expediting his confirmation process, amid partisan gridlock in the Senate.
In addition to that, the U.S. is running low(external link) on artillery shells. It's working to ramp up production amid the war in Ukraine, which has depleted stocks.
The U.S. reportedly transferred(external link) 300,000 155-millimetre shells previously stored in Israel to Ukraine earlier this year.
This is unfolding as the U.S. is increasingly consumed by its rivalry with China, and planning scenarios for any potential future Chinese invasion in Taiwan.
In the midst of this, the U.S. has been trying to broker what would be a history-making pact to normalize relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia.

Image | Israel music festival massacre

Caption: Drone video footage shows burned-out cars on the side of the road near an open-air music festival in Israel where Hamas gunmen fired on those attending on Saturday. (South First Responders/Telegram/Reuters)

Juneau sees Hamas's attack as an attempt to derail those Saudi-Israeli talks by triggering an Israeli counter-attack that inflames Mideast opinion.
He's not sure it will work. Juneau said current events could just as easily push the Saudis to build ties in the region with Iran's other rivals, namely Israel.
What's unquestionable, in his view and that of numerous U.S. officials, is that Iran has trained and funded a constellation of anti-Israeli militias in the region.
"Iran calls it the axis of resistance. Others call it the ring of fire," Juneau, an assistant professor at the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa, told CBC News. "It's a hub and spoke model, with Iran at the centre."

The 'really, really, really bad scenario'

What's less certain is whether Iran specifically planned the Hamas massacres in Israel. The Wall Street Journal reports(external link) that it was involved, but U.S. and Israeli officials said they're not certain the killings were directed from Tehran.
What Juneau is watching now is that northern Israeli border.
He's watching for whether the Lebanon-based Hezbollah militia (with its 200,000 high-quality rockets) enters the fight alongside Gaza-based Hamas.
He was heartened by the limited activity from Hezbollah, through Monday: over the weekend it staged what appeared to be a symbolic firing of rockets(external link) into the sparsely populated Shebaa Farms contested area near the border.
Hezbollah would have to weigh the risk of political blowback at home for any actions: Lebanon is struggling with a calamitous economic collapse(external link) and can ill afford a certain and crushing military response from Israel.
Then there's the other scenario — the one Juneau fears most, and which those above-mentioned U.S. warnings are aimed at preventing.

Image | Palestinians Israel

Caption: The Israeli response: Palestinians inspect the rubble of a mosque destroyed after it was hit by an Israeli airstrike at Shati refugee camp in Gaza City on Monday. (Adel Hana/The Associated Press)

In that scenario, Israel would come under sustained attack from different sides, attacks clearly sanctioned by Iran; direct fighting would break out between Israel and Iran and political pressure would mount for the U.S. to step in.
"At that point we're talking about a really, really, really bad scenario," he said.