21 things you may not know about the Indian Act
Bob Joseph | for CBC News | Posted: April 13, 2016 10:13 PM | Last Updated: April 14, 2016
The Indian Act has been in place for 140 years
The Indian Act has been a lightning rod for criticism and controversy over the years, widely attacked by First Nations people and communities for its regressive and paternalistic excesses.
For example, Status Indians living on reserves don't own the land they live on; assets on reserve are not subject to seizure under legal process making it extremely difficult to borrow money to purchase assets; and matrimonial property laws don't apply to assets on reserve.
The act has also been criticized by non-Aboriginal Peoples and politicians as being too paternalistic and creating an unjust system with excessive costs that are considered uneconomical.
- Dark history of Canada's First Nations pass system uncovered in documentary
- Indian Act turns 140, but few celebrating
- Indian Status: 5 more things you need to know
The Indian Act gave Canada a coordinated approach to Indian policy rather than the pre-Confederation piece-meal approach.
"The great aim of our legislation has been to do away with the tribal system and assimilate the Indian people in all respects with the other inhabitants of the Dominion as speedily as they are fit to change," stated John A. Macdonald, in 1887.
The Act imposed great personal and cultural tragedy on First Nations, many of which continue to affect communities, families and individuals today.
Here are 21 restrictions imposed at some point by the Indian Act in its 140 years of existence.
The Indian Act:
- Denied women status
- Introduced residential schools
- Created reserves
- Renamed individuals with European names
- Restricted First Nations from leaving reserve without permission from Indian agent
- Enforced enfranchisement of any First Nation admitted to university
- Could expropriate portions of reserves for roads, railways and other public works, as well as move an entire reserve away from a municipality if it was deemed expedient
- Could lease out uncultivated reserve lands to non-First Nations if the new leaseholder would use it for farming or pasture
- Forbade First Nations from forming political organizations
- Prohibited anyone, First Nation or non-First Nation, from soliciting funds for First Nation legal claims without special license from the Superintendent General. (this 1927 amendment granted the government control over the ability of First Nations to pursue land claims)
- Prohibited the sale of alcohol to First Nations
- Prohibited sale of ammunition to First Nations
- Prohibited pool hall owners from allowing First Nations entrance
- Imposed the "band council" system
- Forbade First Nations from speaking their native language
- Forbade First Nations from practicing their traditional religion
- Forbade western First Nations from appearing in any public dance, show, exhibition, stampede or pageant wearing traditional regalia
- Declared potlatch and other cultural ceremonies illegal
- Denied First Nations the right to vote
- Created permit system to control First Nations ability to sell products from farms
- Created under the British rule for the purpose of subjugating one race — Aboriginal Peoples
Major amendments were made to the Act in 1951 and 1985. In the 1951 amendments, the banning of dances and ceremonies, and the pursuit of claims against the government were removed. In the 1985, Bill C-31 was introduced. For more on this Bill, please see "Indian Act and Women's Status - Discrimination via Bill C31 and Bill C3"