Before the Alberta oilsands were a moneymaker

In 1979, two Alberta oilsands developments had yet to yield a return on investment, and a third was in the works.

Development costs were in the millions but return on investment had yet to materialize

Will the "tarsands" ever make money?

45 years ago
Duration 2:56
Two Alberta oilsands developments have yet to yield a return on investment in the summer of 1979, and a third is in the works.

Twelve years after the Great Canadian Oilsands company began near Fort McMurray, Alta., it had yet to deliver results.

"Getting oil out of the sands and then making it saleable is still a fledgling technology which does not always work," said CBC reporter Terry Milewski in a story for The National on July 31, 1979.

Pictures showed the gargantuan machines and the crews that operated them to mine the oil, which was trapped in the sandy earth of the region in the province's north.

Oil refinery
The refinery at the Syncrude oilsands plant had been hit by fires and production was running below projections. (The National/CBC Archives)

Great Canadian Oil Sands, which was affiliated with the American Sunoco company, was $35 million "in the red," said Milewski.

Aside from the mining itself, the refinery on site had been shut down by a fire.

The story was much the same at Syncrude, another oilsands operation nearby that was a consortium of oil companies and two levels of government.

"It turns out that tar sand is practically tougher than the equipment used to mine it," said Milewski.

"Tar sand" was a common expression at the time, but CBC style now considers the term inaccurate. The bitumen extracted from the soil is eventually refined into oil, but tar comes from trees and coal.

Man in glasses
Brent Scott said the average cost of a barrel of oil from the sands was about $30 at the start of 1979. The worldwide price at the time was about $15. (The National/CBC Archives)

Together the two companies were producing 75,000 barrels of oil per day — less than half of the amount projected five years earlier.

That oil also cost about four times the projected price, and even if Syncrude could bring its price down to $20 a barrel, the cost of getting the company off the ground didn't seem like a good bargain to Alberta NDP Leader Grant Notley.

"The idea that self-sufficiency means we're not hostage to the Arab oil states, that's technically correct," he said. "But we will be hostages to massive capital advances ... that will be just so costly."

"By the time we get through paying them, we'll wish we were paying the Arab oil magnates."

Man in suit
Alberta NDP Leader Grant Notley said the capital costs of the oilsands were so high that they might not be worth it. (The National/CBC Archives)

Milewski said a third oilsands plant, Alsands, had been approved in principle — although, he noted, its cost was such that it would "make Syncrude look cheap."

The plant was farther north than the other two, and a map of the site showed a new townsite to accommodate an influx of workers.  

But in the end, the Alsands project collapsed.

By 1997, the oilsands were booming, according to the Globe and Mail.

"In a major advance, Suncor [formerly Great Canadian Oil Sands] began using huge shovels and trucks to mine the oil sands in 1992, and Syncrude soon followed," read the article, headlined "Alberta's oil sands come of age." 

Man at podium in front of oilsands workers
Prime Minister Jean Chretien talks to Syncrude workers at the open pit oilsands mine in Fort McMurray, Alta., in June 1996. The prime minister announced the signing of a $5-billion expansion in the oilsands by 18 of Canada's largest oil companies. (Dave Buston/Canadian Press)

Add some “good” to your morning and evening.

Sign up for this biweekly blast from the past, straight from the CBC Archives.

...

The next issue of Flashback will soon be in your inbox.

Discover all CBC newsletters in the Subscription Centre.opens new window

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Google Terms of Service apply.